One of the main aims of the government’s 2012 reforms to higher education was to create a more marketised system. By increasing the tuition fee cap in England to £9,000 per year, the hope was that universities would compete on cost. The attempt was fruitless; little variation in fees emerged and the average cost of university remains stubbornly close to £9,000. However student financial aid has become marketised over the past decade. This has resulted in huge variation and vast inequalities in the amount of financial support received by students. And with the recent abolition of maintenance grants, these inequalities are set to deepen.
TagsABB Admin Applications Aspirations bursaries claire crawford competition contextual admissions election ethnicity first in family gender georg-graetz Gill Wyness Graduates he finance Hello HESA immigration income contingent loans inequality information Institute of Education Jake Anders John Micklewright labour markets Lucy Hunter Marcel Gerard marketisation mobility Outcomes overeducation Oxford participation Postgraduate education predicted grades quality RAB returns to degrees Richard Murphy Scotland Scottish Government Social mobility Steve Gibbons Steve Machin Student debt Student loan student numbers subject choice tuition fees UCAS undermatch universities university quality university rankings Vikki Boliver widening participation
- Do ‘first in family’ university students have different university experiences and outcomes?
- The phenomenon of university undermatch, and why getting poor students into university just isn’t enough
- Small Numbers and Strong Statements: Analysing offers to black students at Oxford
- The international transformation in student loan systems
- The relationship between A-level subject choice and league table score of university attended: the ‘facilitating’, the ‘less suitable’, and the counter-intuitive